Avoid Doing These 5 Things At An Interview

By

InterviewIn one of my older articles, “You Only Have 3 Seconds to Get the Job Offer,” I promised to explain how I know who should get an interview.

The interview with me, a recruiter, is simple: If you meet the minimum qualifications to be considered, I’ll bring you in for the interview. Then the fun starts.

There are a number of sure-fire signs that a person should not be submitted to a client. And I am not talking here about the basics: being late; being dressed inappropriately; smelling bad (from perfume, cologne, or cigarette smoke); bad mouthing current or past employers; talking about sex, religion, or politics; all the basics that everyone knows – or should know!

The first sign is not being prepared. I love it when candidates ask me questions based on what they learned about me from my website. If they researched me, I know they will research the employer and the interviewers. But that’s rare and a nice touch but not necessary.

What’s necessary is knowing the job description. Reading the job description for the first time when they arrive at my office is a clear sign that a candidate does not understand due diligence.

And that’s not all. It also means that when I asked, and I always do, if they read the job description, they lied. No one hires liars. Period.

Second, not being able to answer simple questions. When I ask a finance person a “numbers” question related to a past employer, I don’t mind them having to think about it. Everyone if forgetful, myself included!

But if they can’t answer a question about their current employer, it’s not a good omen. No one hires someone who can’t provide basic information about their current job or employer. Period.

Third, refusing to answer a question. I’ve interviewed scores of veterans and not one has ever used confidentiality as an excuse for not answering a question. There is always a way to answer without giving away corporate or state secrets. If you refuse to answer, you’re hiding something. No one hires candidates with something to hide. Period.

Fourth, not giving a direct answer to a direct question. The interviewer sets the priorities by the questions she asks. If a candidate’s reply deals with extraneous issues, clearly he either does not listen or does not understand what is being asked of him. That means he does not communicate well. No one hires poor communicators. Period.

And fifth, not having questions to ask. Granted, as a recruiter I may not be able to answer most questions, but if a candidate has none, that means that he has not thought about the position. No one hires individuals who do not contemplate what they are doing. Period.

Photo Credit: Shutterstock

About Bruce Hurwitz

Bruce A. Hurwitz, Ph.D., president and CEO of Hurwitz Strategic Staffing, Ltd., has been an executive recruiter and career counselor since 2003.

4 Comments

  1. Laurence

    March 1, 2013 at 2:16 PM

    I have to take exception to the statement that the interviewee should never evade a direct question. This assumes that the interviewer never asks an illegal question. If the interviewer asks point-blank, “Do you have kids?” I suggest an answer such as, “I can understand that you’re concerned about whether my personal situation will interfere with my work. Let me assure you that it never has, and I’ll be sure that it never will when I’m working for you.” Another question that is not illegal but deserves a not-entirely-candid answer is “How much did your last job pay?” or “How much do you expect to be paid?” when the job has not yet been offered. The interviewer should suggest postponing this discussion until both parties can agree that the interviewee is a good fit; or, if pressed, should give only a very broad range. Otherwise, this question is likely to screen the interviewee out of the job in short order.

  2. Amelia

    February 22, 2013 at 4:01 PM

    Could you please give me some sample questions to ask about a prospective job? If the job description is clear and accurate then most of the information is out there for the first interview. I don’t want to sound flippant, but really, other than asking about perks and benefits, which I would hold off until I got a second interview, what sort of questions would I ask.

  3. Liz

    February 20, 2013 at 10:39 AM

    One trend I’ve seen in interviews I’ve had over the past couple of years is the interviewer (or panel) providing the questions either a few minutes before the interview, or at the actual interview. I love having the question to look at because many of the questions contain several parts and even with taking notes one has to be careful not to leave anything out or forget something. I wish this would be come a trend, but of course additional questions could be asked as follow ups to initial questions.

  4. Jim

    February 19, 2013 at 12:34 PM

    There are no absolutes in life. Period. ;0)

Leave a Reply

Your e-mail address will not be published. Fields marked * are required.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>